Re: svn commit: r10835 - trunk/subversion/include

Greg Hudson <ghudson@MIT.EDU> writes:
> On Wed, 2004-09-08 at 10:42, kfogel@collab.net wrote:
> > > - * @deprecated Provided for backward compatibility with the 1.1.0 API.
> > > + * @deprecated Provided for backward compatibility with the 1.0.0 API.
>
> > Is this the right change?
>
> Of course it's the right change. We're deprecating the function in 1.1;
> it's provided for backward compatibility with 1.0.

This change was on trunk, so aren't we deprecating in 1.2?

However, bizarrely, I seem to have misread the change, even though I
looked at it several times :-(. The change *does* deprecate in
exactly the way I was suggesting it should (but thought it didn't).

> A separate question is whether the code was right before, when we
> thought we were deprecating the function in 1.2:

I don't understand this.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Sep 8 21:00:50 2004