Re: [SVN RFC] Making JavaHL easier to maintain?

> I'm also not sure what you mean by the JNI headers we're bundling right now.
> The only header files we're including now are the ones required for the C++
> library.
Ah, okay. I was wrong. Thanks for all of your patience, Justin :)

One last question: If we used SWIG as the backend to interface with
JavaHL, how much simpler would the JavaHL code be? Do you think it's
worth the time investment to look at that?

Cheers,

David

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Sep 3 19:03:50 2004