Hi David,
David James wrote:
>>Could you put directly on the cc of that. I do not want to read
>>svn-breakage in full, only the javahl stuff. On what platform do you
>>plan to set it up?
>>
>>
>Sure. I'm setting it up on Red Hat Linux 7.1.
>
>
>
>>The reason why I did not use that before was, I do not want to force the
>>user to install ant. I think there will be to different kind of people
>>to compile javahl.
>>1. People who just want to use it for like svn4idea or subclipse. They
>>will seldom have to rebuild javahl. I think they can live with the
>>current build system.
>>2. People who want maintain javahl. For them having ant should not a big
>>deal.
>>
>>
>How about we bundle the Ant jar with Subversion?
>
I am not sure about that. That could lead to quiet a number of ant's on
the systems. And there may be license issues to consider.
>
>
>
>>You should be able to it without an installation, if you specify
>>java.class.path and java.library.path correctly. Using ant could be the
>>solution for the dependency problem.
>>
>>
>Sure -- if we're already bundling Ant, we could use it for building
>JavaHL. Does your Ant makefile work for building JavaHL?
>
>
Not yet. But thatīs simple. I think I will commit a new version tonight.
Patrick
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Sep 3 07:46:38 2004