Re: [RFC] Streamlining Binding Installation

> On Thu, 2 Sep 2004, John Peacock wrote:
> The big [disadvantage] being that, until recently, the bindings were not
> as mature and more likely to fail to build correctly. By making a "big
> tent" makefile, you are causing the more stable core build to rely on
> less stable features. Granted, the user has to explicitely ask for that
> pain during configure. At the very least, _no_ bindings should be
> default specifically unless requested.

Heh --- call me cynical, but I believe that if you build *all* bindings by
default, they're much more likely to be kept up-to-date ;-).

Thanks,
Greg

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Sep 2 22:01:24 2004