Hi Ben,
Ben Reser wrote:
>On Wed, Aug 11, 2004 at 02:14:36PM -0500, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
>
>
>>IMO, if we know that the .dsps aren't going to work straight out of
>>the tarball, or that we are going to recommend that folks regenerate
>>them anyway, we shouldn't include them in the tarball.
>>
>>
>
>I have no idea how well and if the include dsps will work. They've just
>always been there. I'm leaving it up to the Windows folks to decide
>what should and should not be in there. If they remove the files there
>will be no objection from me.
>
>
>
The dsp and the bat files work quiet well, since I am with subversion
(around 0.17). That was even before they were generated by gen_make.py.
If you look in the 1.1.0-rc1 tarball you see a relative path in
build_neon.bat. The change to an absolut path off the build machine is
new with rc2. The build with the existing files is real simple if you
start with the zip-file. Just copy the BDB directory into the main
directory and you can start building. That's why I think the problem
with the absolut path should be taken care off.
Patrick
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Aug 12 06:28:51 2004