Re: Subversion 1.1.0 Release Candidate 2 released. Win32 build problem

On Wed, Aug 11, 2004 at 02:14:36PM -0500, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> IMO, if we know that the .dsps aren't going to work straight out of
> the tarball, or that we are going to recommend that folks regenerate
> them anyway, we shouldn't include them in the tarball.

I have no idea how well and if the include dsps will work. They've just
always been there. I'm leaving it up to the Windows folks to decide
what should and should not be in there. If they remove the files there
will be no objection from me.

-- 
Ben Reser <ben@reser.org>
http://ben.reser.org
"Conscience is the inner voice which warns us somebody may be looking."
- H.L. Mencken
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org