[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: svn commit: r10429 - branches/1.1.x/subversion/po

From: Peter N. Lundblad <peter_at_famlundblad.se>
Date: 2004-07-29 08:56:05 CEST

On Wed, 28 Jul 2004, Ben Reser wrote:

> On Wed, Jul 28, 2004 at 11:34:38PM +0200, Peter N. Lundblad wrote:
> > That was the idea when I proposed the change to HACKING some month ago.
> > Ironically, then, jerenkrantz (I believe) objected saying this rule was
> > too relaxed. And now, some people want to relax it even more:-)
> I don't think I'm suggesting that we relax the rule. I thought the rule
> allowed those changes to be merged. Did I miss something in them? I'm
> certainly okay with them the way I understand them.
We have in hacking:

   Without voting:
     - Changes to message translations in .po files as long as format string
       "%" codes are not touched.
   With voting:
     - Changes to message translations in .po files with changes to format
       "%" codes.

I see that we interpret these differently. What would the second rule
allow that the first doesn't under your interpretation?

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Jul 29 08:45:54 2004

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.