Ben Reser wrote:
>On Wed, Jul 28, 2004 at 12:24:45PM -0500, kfogel@collab.net wrote:
>
>
>>Tobias Ringström <tobias@ringstrom.mine.nu> writes:
>>
>>
>>>OK, done, but why? It is not a stable release, so why label it as
>>>such? I've seen one user download that file because it was supposed to
>>>be stable.
>>>
>>>
>>Yes, I am also mystified. Who said to mark it Stable, and why? I
>>would think Draft is appropriate.
>>
>>
>
>Well sussman said nobody would pay attention to it if it was marked as
>Draft. And umm draft doesn't make sense. It's not a draft of
>1.1.0-rc1. It is 1.1.0-rc1. If the flags were like stable, beta,
>release canidate, etc... it might more sense but the flags totally don't
>make sense for software.
>
>
I suppose "baselined" would be the closest fit.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Jul 28 23:34:16 2004