[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Request for another OS X test build

From: Travis P <svn_at_castle.fastmail.fm>
Date: 2004-07-22 03:18:25 CEST

On Jul 21, 2004, at 8:08 PM, Travis P wrote:

> On Jul 21, 2004, at 7:24 AM, Max Bowsher wrote:
>> My attempts to use public access OS X machines in my university
>> computer
>> rooms for svn testing have failed, because they don't have a C
>> compiler :-(
> That's crazy sad. Maybe they just never had it requested? Maybe
> worth asking.
>> Therefore, please could Christian, or someone else with access to OS
>> X, try
>> to build (and install) the python (and perl too if possible) bindings
>> using
>> subversion from the 1.1.x branch, but with r10371 merged from trunk.
>> *Hopefully*, that will fix the bindings on OS X.
>> Max.
> I gave this a shot on my 10.3.4 system. I didn't encounter library
> errors. You can look at the details of what I did below and see if
> my build adequately tested your update. I obviously abbreviated a lot
> of data and am not familiar with the 'make check' reporting system, so
> you'll see I talk about what I saw, some of which may very well be
> non-issues.
> % svn co http://svn.collab.net/repos/svn/branches/1.1.x svn-1.1
> % svn merge -r10370:10371 http://svn.collab.net/repos/svn/trunk .
> % ./configure --enable-maintainer-mode --enable-swig-bindings=all
> --prefix=/tmp/testinstall
> ...
> configure: Enabled swig binding: perl
> configure: Enabled swig binding: python
> configure: Enabled swig binding: java
> checking for swig... none
> ....
> Neon, Apache 2, and BDB were not found found,
> so the DAV access layer and BDB FS were not
> built.
> % make
> % make check
> % make install
> Ran a couple simple commands (using the newly installed svn client)
> against the wc in which I built (status, log) and they worked okay.
> The check had a bunch of failures:
> Running all tests in basic_tests.py...FAILURE
> Running all tests in commit_tests.py...FAILURE
> Running all tests in update_tests.py...FAILURE
> ....
> The tests.log didn't seem to give much data.
> But then it looks like they were re-evaluated and skipped?
> SKIP: basic_tests.py 1: basic checkout of a wc
> SKIP: basic_tests.py 2: basic status command
> SKIP: basic_tests.py 3: basic commit command
> SKIP: basic_tests.py 4: basic update command
> SKIP: basic_tests.py 5: basic mkdir URL
> I've wondered this before and it is relevant to this case: given an
> svn installation, how does one tell if the bindings were built and
> installed?
> -Travis

Oops, forgot to mention that before configure, I ran autogen.sh as
INSTALL instructed.

% sh ./autogen.sh
buildcheck: checking installation...
buildcheck: autoconf version 2.57 (ok)
buildcheck: autoheader version 2.57 (ok)
buildcheck: libtool version 1.5 (ok)
Copying libtool helper: /usr/share/aclocal/libtool.m4

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Jul 22 03:17:37 2004

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.