Re: the dangers of DB_LOG_AUTOREMOVE

Greg Hudson <ghudson@MIT.EDU> writes:
> In the long run, I think the answer is to make FSFS the default in 1.2
> if it seems to work well, and to kill the BDB back end in 2.0 if we've
> managed to write an SQL back end by that time.

+(1 / sqrt(2)) on making FSFS the default in 1.2.

Don't have any thoughts right now on lifespan of BDB. A lot of
scalability testing has been done on BDB that hasn't been done on
FSFS.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Jul 16 21:39:23 2004