Re: [PATCH] Default to fsfs when not built with Berkeley DB

--On 14 July 2004 12:18 -0400 Eric Gillespie <epg@pretzelnet.org> wrote:

> Greg Hudson <ghudson@MIT.EDU> writes:
>
>> The patch looks good technically. I didn't do this originally
>> because I thought it might bother other developers for svn to
>> silently use a new and unfamiliar repository format in this
>> situation, so you might give people a chance to object.
>
> Yeah, i will wait for more comment. I think this is a non-issue
> however. The configure script still whines quite loudly about
> the absence of Berkeley DB. And if they grab someone else's
> binaries, it's out of our hands anyway.

I would say that it would be nice if svnadmin were to give you some
indication of the default type, perhaps as part of the svnadmin create
--help command. Especially as creation of a repo is a silent matter.

-apw

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Jul 16 12:10:46 2004