Re: [PATCH] Default to fsfs when not built with Berkeley DB

Greg Hudson <ghudson@MIT.EDU> writes:

> The patch looks good technically. I didn't do this originally
> because I thought it might bother other developers for svn to
> silently use a new and unfamiliar repository format in this
> situation, so you might give people a chance to object.

Yeah, i will wait for more comment. I think this is a non-issue
however. The configure script still whines quite loudly about
the absence of Berkeley DB. And if they grab someone else's
binaries, it's out of our hands anyway.

--
Eric Gillespie <*> epg@pretzelnet.org

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Jul 14 18:18:38 2004