Re: svn 1.1: All aboard. Train is leaving the station.

On Wed, 2004-07-07 at 09:57, kfogel@collab.net wrote:

> You're maybe misremembering the long period of "let's slow down trunk
> development and try to stabilize", and thinking that was the "freeze".
> It wasn't. The freeze happened after that, and was on a branch, and
> lasted over a month. Trunk development continued while the 1.0 branch
> was frozen. The only reason trunk development slowed during that time
> is because a lot of developers were busy with 1.0 testing, discussion,
> etc, and because we did discourage really radical trunk changes during
> that time. But this was due to the special nature of the 1.0 effort,
> not because trunk was officially frozen.

Wow, I feel dumb. You are *so* right. I misremembered freezing trunk
for a month, but looking at log messages now, I see we didn't. I guess
it just *felt* like trunk was frozen. :-)

If I had remembered this, I wouldn't have even brought up the question
of what to freeze. Doh!

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Jul 7 18:35:12 2004