[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: svn commit: r10133 - in trunk/subversion: include libsvn_subr tests/clients/cmdline tests/libsvn_subr

From: Branko Čibej <brane_at_xbc.nu>
Date: 2004-07-05 00:38:21 CEST

Josh Pieper wrote:

>Ben Reser wrote:
>>On Sun, Jul 04, 2004 at 11:57:24AM -0400, Josh Pieper wrote:
>>>Ok, in IRC ghudson proposed:
>>><ghudson> Well, I'd agree with your initial judgement that we
>>>shouldn't be collapsing .. segments, and then if we changed the
>>>apr_filepath_merge() call in opt.c to an svn_path_canonicalize, we'd
>>>fix the case I mentioned was broken.
>>>I don't believe we considered the symlink case when breser and I
>>>initially talked on IRC about supporting collapsing "/../" elements.
>>>Does anyone have objections to just removing the ".." collapsing
>>>support from svn_path_canonicalize? That would also resolve the issue
>>>of implementing svn_path_canonicalize in terms of apr_filepath_merge.
>>No we sure didn't. But if we remove the colapsing of .. in paths we
>>still need it in URLs. See the comment by Klaus Rennecke about the
>>weirdness that occurs with URLS with /../ in them.
>file:/// URLs would have to be special cased then to leave the ".."
>path elements in since a portion is directly translated to a
>filesystem path.
No they do not. They're still URLs, not paths.

And please, for the last time, it's file://, not file:/// -- two
slashes, not three, if you want to be consistent with the others.

-- Brane

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Mon Jul 5 00:40:24 2004

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.