Josh Pieper wrote:
>Ben Reser wrote:
>
>
>>On Sun, Jul 04, 2004 at 11:57:24AM -0400, Josh Pieper wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Ok, in IRC ghudson proposed:
>>>
>>><ghudson> Well, I'd agree with your initial judgement that we
>>>shouldn't be collapsing .. segments, and then if we changed the
>>>apr_filepath_merge() call in opt.c to an svn_path_canonicalize, we'd
>>>fix the case I mentioned was broken.
>>>
>>>I don't believe we considered the symlink case when breser and I
>>>initially talked on IRC about supporting collapsing "/../" elements.
>>>Does anyone have objections to just removing the ".." collapsing
>>>support from svn_path_canonicalize? That would also resolve the issue
>>>of implementing svn_path_canonicalize in terms of apr_filepath_merge.
>>>
>>>
>>No we sure didn't. But if we remove the colapsing of .. in paths we
>>still need it in URLs. See the comment by Klaus Rennecke about the
>>weirdness that occurs with URLS with /../ in them.
>>
>>
>
>file:/// URLs would have to be special cased then to leave the ".."
>path elements in since a portion is directly translated to a
>filesystem path.
>
>
No they do not. They're still URLs, not paths.
And please, for the last time, it's file://, not file:/// -- two
slashes, not three, if you want to be consistent with the others.
-- Brane
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Mon Jul 5 00:40:24 2004