[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Why svn 2.0 may come sooner than we expected

From: Garrett Rooney <rooneg_at_gmail.com>
Date: 2004-07-02 00:26:56 CEST

On Thu, 01 Jul 2004 17:19:40 -0500, Ben Collins-Sussman
<sussman@collab.net> wrote:
> On Thu, 2004-07-01 at 17:07, Greg Hudson wrote:
> > But we'll have to use APR 1.0 when we use httpd
> > 2.2. So, depending on when we expect httpd 2.2, we may wind up going
> > straight from 1.1 to 2.0.
> Is there some reason to think that we're required to use httpd 2.2 when
> it's released? Aren't we allowed to just say, "sorry, SVN works with
> httpd 2.0.x and APR 0.9 only?"

I'm not clear why this really matters... I mean up to now we've
supported both APR 0.9 (which is actually shipped in the svn releases)
and 1.0, which you have to go get from CVS. Why not just continue to
do that going forward? Our 'official' version is 0.9, but if people
want to use 1.0 they know where to get it. Similar with whatever
version of Apache people care to use.


To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Jul 2 00:27:40 2004

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.