Re: Feature request: Auto-logging of merges

On Mon, Jun 14, 2004 at 11:27:39PM -0400, Bill Soudan wrote:
>
> On Mon, 14 Jun 2004, John Peacock wrote:
>
> > Bill Soudan wrote:
> > > I had proposed a similar idea on #svn a few weeks back for the same reason
> > > -- interim merge tracking. I was thinking more along the lines of setting
> > > properties on the WC which would be attached to the commit in the form of
> > > revision properties.
> >
> > I hate to continue to flog this, but svk already does merge tracking:
> >
> > http://svk.elixus.org
> >
> > and it does it for real, not just logging the information. I really have to

At one point I seem to remember Tom Lord offering up the "Arch"
code for use in Subversion (tho possibly to displace entire
portions of functionality).

Is it totally outlandish to think there might be a way to
steal/graft some of the merge-tracking and functionality
from svk to svn? (I suppose I single SVN+SVK functional merge
is totally out of the question, even if some of the tougher
choices about it could be made configuration options on being
distributed versus centralized, or to what extent)

-- 
Brad Appleton <brad@bradapp.net> www.bradapp.net
  Software CM Patterns (www.scmpatterns.com)
   Effective Teamwork, Practical Integration
"And miles to go before I sleep." -- Robert Frost
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org