Re: [Issue 1597] switch to apr_temp_dir_get() at APR 0.9.6

On Tue, 2004-06-08 at 18:23, Greg Hudson wrote:

> We're just as much tied to APR 0.9 as httpd is, because we use apr types
> in our ABI, and I believe those type definitions (particularly
> apr_off_t) change in APR 1.0.
>
> (Remember how Karl and company were so keen on a solution to the
> apr_off_t problem that didn't involve making API changes before the 1.0
> release? Well, reap the whirlwind.)

Hm, yah. I guess I need to think of the APR 0.9 and 1.0 branches more
as "1.0" and "2.0" branches. Phoo.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Jun 9 01:28:20 2004