Re: [Issue 1597] switch to apr_temp_dir_get() at APR 0.9.6

On Tue, 2004-06-08 at 19:07, Ben Collins-Sussman wrote:
> On Tue, 2004-06-08 at 18:01, Branko Čibej wrote:
> > Yes. AFAIK the httpd-2.0.x series is tied to the apr-0.9.x branch.

I would actually expect all of httpd 2.x to be tied to apr-0.9.x, given
the Apache versioning rules. Perhaps they don't realize it, though.

> ...and we're tied to whatever APR httpd is using, because if Subversion
> and Apache's APR don't match, bad things happen, right?
>
> /me pounds head on wall.

We're just as much tied to APR 0.9 as httpd is, because we use apr types
in our ABI, and I believe those type definitions (particularly
apr_off_t) change in APR 1.0.

(Remember how Karl and company were so keen on a solution to the
apr_off_t problem that didn't involve making API changes before the 1.0
release? Well, reap the whirlwind.)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Jun 9 01:24:47 2004