Re: Proposal: begin 1.1 release stabilization.

> The Chicago guys have been chatting, and we think that it would be good
> to start stabilizing for a 1.1 release. I hope others agree.

Wholehartedly: +1

> * Why release 1.1?
>
> As Mark Phippard pointed out, there doesn't seem to be any good
> reason to delay svn 1.1 for a locking feature. The locking stuff is
> still in the design phase, and meanwhile /trunk is full of all sorts
> of great new things. It's been nearly four months since 1.0 was
> released, so the time "feels right" for 1.1. Users shouldn't have
> to wait for locking to be designed and written to start using the
> new features.
>
>
> * Major highlights of svn 1.1
>
> - new plain filesystem repository back-end (libsvn_fs_fs)
> - framework for localized errors, with a few initial translations.
> - diff and other commands correctly follow renames (issue #1093)
> - libsvn_wc scalability & speed improvements
> - new 'svnadmin dump --deltas'
> - new 'svn export --native-eol'
> - (?? improved bindings ?? bindings and win32 build improvements??)
> - many bugfixes that couldn't be backported to 1.0.x
>
> ...any other major things I've forgotten?

- translatable client?
- DLLs on Windows?
 

bye,

Erik.

-- 
+++ Jetzt WLAN-Router für alle DSL-Einsteiger und Wechsler +++
GMX DSL-Powertarife zudem 3 Monate gratis* http://www.gmx.net/dsl
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org