[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Subversion branch deltification policy is more space-hungry than CVS

From: Vincent Lefevre <vincent+svn_at_vinc17.org>
Date: 2004-05-28 17:11:59 CEST

[Note: sorry if this has already been dealt with, but I have very
limited e-mail access until Monday.]

On 2004-05-26 20:57:20 -0400, John Peacock wrote:
> But the number of fulltexts generated per branch is going to vary
> wildly among various projects; in some cases the branch is going to
> be mostly node copies, in others it might have lots of modified
> files.

If I've understood correctly, there seems to be a problem, though,
when directories or files are moved/renamed. It has been said that
this was implemented as a copy+delete. But Mark Benedetto King said
that fulltexts live forever, even if one deletes the branch (here
the branch would correspond to the original filename). And as the
copy would normally be modified since it is the main file (under a
new name), this would give a second fulltext.

Vincent Lefèvre <vincent_at_vinc17.org> - Web: <http://www.vinc17.org/>
100% validated (X)HTML - Acorn / RISC OS / ARM, free software, YP17,
Championnat International des Jeux Mathématiques et Logiques, etc.
Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / SPACES project at LORIA
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sat May 29 10:51:47 2004

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.