Re: Bug: svn-1.0.4 stops at 65536 revisions

Because SVN_REVNUM_INVALID is -1.

On Fri, May 28, 2004 at 11:20:02AM -0400, John Peacock wrote:
> typedef long int svn_revnum_t;
>
> As an aside to the list, why is this not
>
> typedef unsigned long int svn_revnum_t;
>
> instead (since negative revision numbers make little sense)? I admit
> that 2 billion revisions seems large enough, but why settle for that
> when you can have 4 billion. ;) Obviously that's a version 2.0.0
> question...

Cheers,
CLK

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri May 28 17:34:46 2004