Re: Bug: svn-1.0.4 stops at 65536 revisions
From: John Peacock <jpeacock_at_rowman.com>
Date: 2004-05-28 17:20:02 CEST
Øyvind A. Holm wrote:
> to see how Subversion performed when it contained lots of revisions. The
The number you quote is exactly 2**16, which is the largest value for an
typedef long int svn_revnum_t;
So why is that much smaller number being used? Is there something in
As an aside to the list, why is this not
typedef unsigned long int svn_revnum_t;
instead (since negative revision numbers make little sense)? I admit
John
-- John Peacock Director of Information Research and Technology Rowman & Littlefield Publishing Group 4501 Forbes Boulevard Suite H Lanham, MD 20706 301-459-3366 x.5010 fax 301-429-5748 --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.orgReceived on Fri May 28 17:20:08 2004 |
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.
This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.