On Sat, 22 May 2004, [UTF-8] Branko Ä^Libej wrote:
> Peter N. Lundblad wrote:
>
> You don't have to. Look at apr_errno.h: you'll notice that the core
> posix-like codes (APR_EACCES, APR_ENOSPC, etc.) are mapped to the errono
> values on all platforms. The Windows C runtime does use a number of
> these, so the value of errno is always a valid APR error code.
>
> >What I'd like is something more than the generic write error, but if it is
> >difficult on non-POSIX systems, I'll just return the generic one and go
> >on.
> >
> >
> I'd suggest using plain errno as an APR error code. we can test what
> happens on Windows.
>
This one was done in r9853 if you didn't notice. Anyone cares to trigger a
printf error on Windows and see what happens?
Thanks,
//Peter
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed May 26 16:31:11 2004