Re: API cleanups for 2.0 (was Re: Issue 780 and status and notify functions)

Greg Hudson wrote:

>On Mon, 2004-05-24 at 09:39, kfogel@collab.net wrote:
>
>
>>No reason for that list to be private, yah. Should we file one issue
>>for general API cleanups, or N issues, one per cleanup?
>>
>>
>
>The main problem with using one issue for N tasks is that it's hard to
>keep track of what's finished and what's not. We could make a keyword,
>perhaps.
>
>
I'd prefer a 2.0 API meta-issue that lists all the specific API changes
as dependencies. That lets you create nice dependency trees, jump back
and forth between dependent/depending issues, etc.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue May 25 17:01:49 2004