Re: [PATCH] SVN_REVFMT_T -> svn_revnum_to_cstring

On Sat, 8 May 2004, [UTF-8] Branko Ä^Libej wrote:

> Peter N. Lundblad wrote:
>
> >On Sat, 8 May 2004, [UTF-8] Branko Ä^Libej wrote:
> >Please, consensus on this matter would be useful before I spend more time
> >on this patch (and possibly start another boring walkthrough replacing
> >SVN_REVNUM_T_FMT with something...
> >

> When we decided on keeping SVN_REVNUM_T_FMT, I don't think anybody
> expected such a huge change in the code. I certainly didn't. Now that I
> see the results, I'd just use %ld in messages.
>
That would also be a huge change:-) Except for the addition of a pool
argument in some internal functions, the same places need to be updated.

I'll do it this way instead if you prefer it. I'll wait a few days to give
more developers a chance to have an opinion.

Regards,
//Peter

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sat May 8 22:32:41 2004