[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Remaining l10n issues

From: Greg Hudson <ghudson_at_MIT.EDU>
Date: 2004-05-05 18:13:14 CEST

On Wed, 2004-05-05 at 11:19, Peter N. Lundblad wrote:
> Then we have the SVN_REVNUM_T_FMT matter. I think the consensus was to
> add
> some function svn_revnum_to_string(revnum, pool) function and use it
> everywhere, deprecating SVN_REVNUM_T_FMT.

There's no reason to deprecate SVN_REVNUM_T_FMT; application code could
still make use of it.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed May 5 18:13:36 2004

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.