Re: svn commit: r9487 - in branches/fs-abstraction/subversion: libsvn_fs libsvn_fs_baseline

On Mon, 2004-04-26 at 16:02, Garrett Rooney wrote:
> Well, I don't know if I particularly like building infrastructure for
> theoretical new backends for the fs library, but hey, I'm not the one
> doing the work.

Since there's already some care taken in libsvn_fs to separate out most
of the BDB-specific parts, I think it would create a mess to start using
"svn_fs_bdb" as a library prefix for symbols there.

(Also, the only FSP infrastructure being built here is in the new name
choice for the existing FS implementation.)

> I'd also say that 'libsvn_fs_base' would be nicer than
> 'libsvn_fs_baseline', to stress that it's a sort of 'base class' for
> other db based implementations to extend. I'm not sure what exactly
> 'baseline' indicated to me when I first saw it, but it wasn't that.

I was just following gat's document. I can rename it to "base" if no
one disagrees. If nothing else, it will eliminate the need to use "bl"
as an abbreviation, which always seemed terribly opaque to me.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Mon Apr 26 22:12:52 2004