[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Merging r9254

From: <kfogel_at_collab.net>
Date: 2004-04-16 21:17:27 CEST

Ben Collins-Sussman <sussman@collab.net> writes:
> We're starting to get to the point where a lot of backported changes
> don't apply cleanly to the 1.0.x branch anymore. In IRC, breser and I
> were thinking that maybe it's time to start voting on backported
> patches, rather than revnums.

For strictly textual conflicts, I don't think an extra patch stage is
needed. For semantic dependencies, well, that's a different
question...

Is the latter happening a lot?

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Apr 16 22:32:31 2004

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.