Re: Dropping SVN_REVNUM_T_FMT define

On Fri, 2004-04-09 at 14:52, Nicolás Lichtmaier wrote:
> Revision numbers are longs, long's printf format is defined to be %ld in
> every arch. The %ld formst specifier will take 64bits in Tru64, and it
> will take 32 bits in i386. Just as "long" will measure on each of such
> platforms.
>
> Why don't we just drop this define and replace it with hardcoded %ld's.
> Or do you expect someday to replace revision numbers with "long long"'s?

The question is, for the sake of gettext, is it worth dropping our
svn_revnum_t abstraction?

If not, Nicolas, what's our alternative?

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Apr 9 22:01:59 2004