Nicolás Lichtmaier <nick@reloco.com.ar> wrote on 04/02/2004 11:24:50 AM:
>
> Yes, definitely. But there's more... imagine you have a deep hierarchy
> filled with document files (not code). And every such document might
> have lots of tags. How do I do that? Subversion tagging is designed for
> tagging whole trees, not for the simple per-file labeling you can do
> with CVS and ClearCase. CMM needs lots of tagging, and that tagging
> needs to be manageable. This creates a problem with the current
> subversion tagging model and its capabilities. Managing these tasks
> sounds like a pain with subversion.
>
I am not a CMM expert, not sure there even is such a thing, but I have had
some exposure to it. CMM is about having a defined process and using it
to make improvements to the process. It does not prescribe any specific
process or tools or techniques. So your need for tags may be perfectly
valid for the process you want to implement, but you could still be
CMM-compliant without doing anything with tags. I am only pointing this
out for those that might be left with the impression that they could not
use Subversion with CMM.
Mark
Received on Fri Apr 2 16:55:46 2004