Hi Justin,
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> --On Thursday, April 1, 2004 8:11 AM +0200 Patrick Mayweg
> <mayweg@qint.de> wrote:
>
>> What do you think remains to be done for javahl?
>
>
> Probably getting the integrated build stuff to work with Windows for
> javahl and SWIG/Java. I don't have a foggy clue as to how Java could
> be integrated with MSVC. This'll require someone with Python, Java,
> and Win32-fu - a perhaps rare combination. ;-)
I am fine with the Java and Win32-fu. My Python is not so good. I have
not yet tried to unterstand how the Win32 projects are build.
What about the SWIG/java build? I have seen that it is included in the
main buildsystem right now.
>
> Once we ensure that Win32 people can build it as part of the 'core'
> build system, I think the next step would be to yank the old automake
> build system for javahl and force everyone to use the integrated build
> for javahl for a bit on the trunk. I'm sure there may be buglets in
> what we have, so it'll be important to test them out early and often.
The old automake build system could be yanked from the trunk right now.
It is only used for the now Windows build, and for that we have got the
integrated build. For the windows build we have other files. I think I
may delete it over the weekend.
>
> What do you think of this plan? -- justin
Thats fine with me.
Patrick
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Apr 1 09:39:51 2004