Re: FS abstraction levels

Greg Hudson wrote:

>On Wed, 2004-03-31 at 08:56, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
>
>
>>> * It's necessary to abstract at the libsvn_fs API level for my
>>> project.
>>>
>>>
>>I can't say if this is true to not; I *can* say that it's a crying
>>shame that you'll basically be reimplementing the entire libsvn_fs.
>>
>>
>
>I don't think I can reuse much of an implementation that maps FS
>concepts to DB concepts. Though there may be some stuff that can be
>factored out, particularly in the realm of auto-merging.
>
>
And probably the DAG abstraction, too. Maybe the API vtable should be at
the DAG layer, not the public FS layer.

-- 
Brane Čibej   <brane_at_xbc.nu>   http://www.xbc.nu/brane/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org