[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: FS abstraction levels

From: Branko Čibej <brane_at_xbc.nu>
Date: 2004-04-01 04:19:33 CEST

Greg Hudson wrote:

>On Wed, 2004-03-31 at 08:56, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
>>> * It's necessary to abstract at the libsvn_fs API level for my
>>> project.
>>I can't say if this is true to not; I *can* say that it's a crying
>>shame that you'll basically be reimplementing the entire libsvn_fs.
>I don't think I can reuse much of an implementation that maps FS
>concepts to DB concepts. Though there may be some stuff that can be
>factored out, particularly in the realm of auto-merging.
And probably the DAG abstraction, too. Maybe the API vtable should be at
the DAG layer, not the public FS layer.

Brane Čibej   <brane_at_xbc.nu>   http://www.xbc.nu/brane/
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Apr 1 04:21:53 2004

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.