Re: [PATCH] Do not use gettextize and i18n round 2 Re: I18n: The gettext proposal

>I'm still confused. There are two statements here:
>
> > You can't add a function call anywhere in the code. You can't add
> > a function call in a static initializer ...
>
>How is the first statement true?
>
>Regarding the second statement, does it matter for Subversion? We
>have few such initializations, and those we do have may not need to be
>translated. At worst, we might have to change some code. It doesn't
>seem like a showstopper, anyway.
>
>

Subversion has such cases. See svn_cl__cmd_table in "svn"'s main.c . But
it's handled the way I've said earlier. By marking those occurences with
a NOOP macro (so that xgettext sees them) and by adding a gettext call
where these values are used.

>(I understand that you were just explaining things. My confusion is
>really about the assertion that Subversion strings will have a
>problem, which originated with Justin, I think, not you.)
>
>

And there's no such problem at all... =)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Mar 31 05:02:25 2004