Ben Reser wrote:
[snip]
>
> I think we should fix them individually. Making the function smarter as
> you point out wouldn't solve the whole problem. While, individual fixes
> can reasonably solve the entire problem.
>
> Renaming the function isn't a good option. It's in the public API. I
> tend to think the name is fine. It's just being misapplied to URLs.
I was wondering about that...the commandline functions are considered
part of the API even though they aren't in a library? Can a client call
them? But I agree that changing it doesn't really solve the problem.
>
> Looks like it is used in the info command, propedit, propset, propget,
> propdel, status and proplist. I haven't looked to see if they are
> correct or not.
>
Yes, I looked at these, but I don't believe info, propedit, propdel, and
propset work on url's (at least not yet). And status is really working
with paths not urls, so it should be fine also. I'll work on fixing
propget and proplist tomorrow evening.
DJ
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Mar 19 04:59:48 2004