Re: Naming of function versions

Nuutti Kotivuori wrote:
[snip]
>
> No, I don't think you have. I just haven't seen any project where
> deprecated functions would have not disappeared in a following major
> release, but instead become the supported functions again. Also, I
> don't believe I have seen the something2 naming for new functions
> anywhere. So I would not call those methods conventional. But that may
> ofcourse be just me.
>
> -- Naked
>

FWIW, the something2 naming is all over the place in MS API's --
especially COM interfaces. They also used to use somethingEx, but
mostly stopped doing that as there is nowhere to go after
that...somethingExEx?

Hardly makes it a standard, of course, but at least it's not unprecedented.

DJ

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Mar 18 14:46:12 2004