Re: findings on swig-java-bindings
From: Gustav Munkby <grddev_at_gmx.net>
Date: 2004-03-16 22:50:47 CET
> > It's possible these warnings are false alarms, but if they are not
Since the code is automatically generated by SWIG, the proper way of fixing
If talking about quick fixes, all these dirty casts could be changed into
The above solution provides the same functionality as adding
Another solution would be to not use an optimization lever >= 2 for gcc3,
As someone suggested, a possible solution would be to have to separate
Since it's really a problem with gcc3 trying to apply inapplicable
But that's only my opinion, and I'm not really in a position to decide here.
!g
-- +++ NEU bei GMX und erstmalig in Deutschland: TÜV-geprüfter Virenschutz +++ 100% Virenerkennung nach Wildlist. Infos: http://www.gmx.net/virenschutz --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.orgReceived on Tue Mar 16 22:51:03 2004 |
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.
This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.