Re: svn commit: r9033 - trunk/subversion/libsvn_ra_svn

Philip Martin <philip@codematters.co.uk> writes:
> > The same comments I mailed about r9032 would apply here, about
> > function-body subpool vs iteration subpool. (This was reverted in
> > r9044 anyway, though, for other reasons?)
>
> r9044 was a different solution rather than a simple revert of r9032,
> that's why the log message says "follow up" rather than "revert".

Thanks. I was just careless with language, wasn't a misreading of the
change, don't worry.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Mar 16 00:29:53 2004