Re: svn commit: r9033 - trunk/subversion/libsvn_ra_svn

kfogel@collab.net writes:

> The same comments I mailed about r9032 would apply here, about
> function-body subpool vs iteration subpool. (This was reverted in
> r9044 anyway, though, for other reasons?)

r9044 was a different solution rather than a simple revert of r9032,
that's why the log message says "follow up" rather than "revert".

-- 
Philip Martin
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org