Re: Regression Test Failure on 1.0.1

On Sat, 13 Mar 2004, Philip Martin wrote:

> David Summers <david@summersoft.fay.ar.us> writes:
>
> > CMD: svn <TIME = 0.109746>
> > PASS: getopt_tests.py 1: run svn with no arguments
> > CMD: svn "--version" "--config-dir"
> > "/home/david/rpms/build/subversion-1.0.1/subversion/tests/clients/cmdline/local_tmp/config"
> > <TIME = 0.022864>
> > Standard output does not match.
> > Expected standard output:
> > =====
> > svn, version X.Y.Z
> >
> > Copyright (C) YYYY-YYYY CollabNet
> > Subversion is open source software, see http://subversion.tigris.org/
> > This product includes software developed by CollabNet
> > (http://www.Collab.Net/).
> >
> > The following repository access (RA) modules are available:
> >
> > =====
> > Actual standard output:
> > =====
> > svn, version 1.0.1
>
> $ svn diff -r8808:8809 http://svn.collab.net/repos/svn/branches/1.0.0/subversion/tests/clients/cmdline/getopt_tests.py
> Index: getopt_tests.py
> ===================================================================
> --- getopt_tests.py (revision 8808)
> +++ getopt_tests.py (revision 8809)
> @@ -63,9 +63,10 @@
> # This is a list of lines to search and replace text on.
> rep_lines_res = [
> # In 'svn --version', this line varies, for example:
> - # "Subversion Client, version 0.10.2 (dev build)"
> - # "Subversion Client, version 0.10.2 (r1729)"
> - (re.compile(r'version \d+\.\d+\.\d+ \(.*\)'),
> + # "svn, version 0.10.2 (dev build)"
> + # "svn, version 0.10.2 (r1729)"
> + # "svn, version 1.0.0"
> + (re.compile(r'version \d+\.\d+\.\d+( \(.*\))?'),
> 'version X.Y.Z '),
> # The copyright end date keeps changing; fix forever.
> (re.compile(r'Copyright \(C\) 2000-\d+ CollabNet\.'),
>
> That was a change on the "temporary" 1.0.0 branch that didn't make it
> back onto the 1.0.x branch :-(
>
>

Hmmm, Ok. I *thought* I remembered something about a change to the
version output but you beat me to finding it, thanks.

I'm retrying with that patch....but no-one else is seeing that but me? If so,
why?

I'll post when I know the results if my new build with that patch.

If no-one else is seeing it then I'll just build my 1.0.1 RPMs with that
patch and note the bugaboo in the change log. Otherwise, how did it
escape past people? (I obviously should be running the checks more
often). I guess we need to nominate that one immediately for 1.0.2?

-- 
David Wayne Summers          "Linux: Because reboots are for hardware upgrades!"
david_at_summersoft.fay.ar.us   PGP Key: http://summersoft.fay.ar.us/~david/pgp.txt
PGP Key fingerprint =  C0 E0 4F 50 DD A9 B6 2B  60 A1 31 7E D2 28 6D A8 
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org