RE: Re: .svn vs _svn on VS.NET (ASP.NET) -> Note of historical interest..
From: Bryan Andrews <bandrews_at_trendinfluence.com>
Date: 2004-03-11 04:31:37 CET
The thing I am trying to understand is if there is any desire to attract .net developers? If so then it would be prudent to make this happen now before MS gets their act together and releases a real source control system (not the SS junk they have now).
I think that the subversion team would like it to work for .net developers as long as they don't sacrifice the integrity of the platform, but there are definitely some folks who are very possessive and could care less if .net developers benefited.
It's hard for me to stand on the sidelines and not comment when we stand to gain such a great source control platform.
By the way I just heard today that Whidbey is scheduled for release in first half of 2005.
-----Original Message-----
On Thursday, March 11, 2004 Damon Rand wrote:
> Personally, I have long since converted to Eclipse and Delphi.net and have
> http://subversion.tigris.org/servlets/ReadMsg?list=dev&msgId=164749
> ... dated April 17, 2002.
> If you guys want to still be having 60 message threads in another two years
Yes, but few things in this world can be as satisfactory as imposing your
All that bullshit about breaking compatibility and not being able to
They had two years to stabilize the API before 1.0 and after many
Let's face it, 75%+ of those who are against this change opose it
One week on this list and it's clear to me that they don't want to
Too bad that Subversion is such a great product and there isn't
Adal Chiriliuc
---------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------
|
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.
This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.