Re: [BUG] svn:executable has bad security implications.

On Tue, 2004-03-09 at 15:35, Ben Reser wrote:
> Unfortunately APR doesn't provide us a good way to deal with this. It
> doesn't provide a way to get the umask. Nor does it provide a way to
> set perms while respecting the umask.

Could we set the x bits corresponding to the already-set r bits,
perhaps? That seems safe, and shouldn't require any APR hackery.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Mar 9 21:59:51 2004