Re: Issue #1756 -- import doesn't handle svn:eol-style or svn:keywords
From: Julian Foad <julianfoad_at_btopenworld.com>
Date: 2004-03-09 21:56:52 CET
C. Michael Pilato wrote:
OK.
> I have two main reasons for why I think it could be okay for import to
OK if our behaviour is documented. (Presently, it isn't in the book: the section on svn:eol-style doesn't mention consistency, and auto-props aren't mentioned at all.)
> (2) Import never touches the original file. So if something goes
Good point.
Thank you for explaining your thoughts. I accept your reasoning that it could be OK for Subversion to repair line endings in some situations and complain in others, if we wanted that. I had not thought of those arguments. Yet, as fas as I know, we still have no reason to want that difference, so we should keep things simple by having the same behaviour in all cases. If the documentation can be simple and yet accurate, that tends to be a good sign.
> All of that said, I don't have strong opinions about the matter. I
For the record, I am interpreting this as meaning that you do not object to r8950 (which causes inconsistencies to be rejected).
> think the majority of the use cases which are interesting to this
Indeed they could. Still, the fewer edge case surprises we have, the better.
- Julian
---------------------------------------------------------------------
|
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.
This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.