Re: [PATCH v2] svn status --non-recursive should not recurse

"D.J. Heap" <dj@shadyvale.net> writes:

> I can run this through the tests and commit it this weekend if no one
> beats me to it, there are no objections, and Philip still approves it,
> of course.

OK.

> Jon Foster wrote:

>> 2) I'd like to reduce further the number of locks that are taken.
>> This patch still errs on the side of locking too much, which gives
>> correct output but is not as fast as possible. It locks much less
>> than before, though. This looks like it will require careful
>> thought and testing - which is one reason to write the test-cases
>> first. (This is the FIXME in the patch).

When anchor and target are different you may want to take a
non-recursive lock on the anchor, and then take a target lock using
anchor as the associated lock. The current patch can be committed
without this.

-- 
Philip Martin
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org