Arild Fines wrote:
> John Peacock wrote:
>
>>I finally got over the core problem (forgot to init a hash) and everything
>>tests clean. I will post the diff to the issue RSN (I need to add tests
>>and a commit message). Unfortunately, the patch changes some function
>>signatures so that it will not be suitable for the 1.1.x development (as I
>>read HACKING), which is a great disappointment. I wish I had taken the
>>time to do this several months ago so it could have been part of 1.0; now
>>it will hang in limbo until 2.0...
>>
>>I have to say that _I_ think the APR versioning guidelines are too
>>restrictive for an application (but understandable for a library).
>
>
> Subversion *is* a library to some of us.
I was going to say the same. The number of tools being built up around the
core Subversion libraries and default commandline client is staggering, and
that number will only continue to grow as Subversion gains popularity, an
inevitability given the release of 1.0 final. Applying rigorous versioning
guidelines Subversion Just Makes Sense.
- Dan
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Feb 20 20:45:40 2004