RE: [UPDATED] was Re: [POST 1.0 task] Custom Keywords - Issue 890

John Peacock wrote:
> I finally got over the core problem (forgot to init a hash) and everything
> tests clean. I will post the diff to the issue RSN (I need to add tests
> and a commit message). Unfortunately, the patch changes some function
> signatures so that it will not be suitable for the 1.1.x development (as I
> read HACKING), which is a great disappointment. I wish I had taken the
> time to do this several months ago so it could have been part of 1.0; now
> it will hang in limbo until 2.0...
>
> I have to say that _I_ think the APR versioning guidelines are too
> restrictive for an application (but understandable for a library).

Subversion *is* a library to some of us.

--
Arild
AnkhSVN: http://ankhsvn.tigris.org
Blog: http://ankhsvn.com/blog
IRC: irc://irc.freenode.net/ankhsvn
"The Guide is definitive. Reality is frequently inaccurate."
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org