[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: cvs2svn: another vendor branch problem?

From: <kfogel_at_collab.net>
Date: 2004-02-19 16:51:41 CET

Thanks -- I will take a look at this as soon as can!


Stijn Hoop <stijn@win.tue.nl> writes:
> On Wed, Feb 18, 2004 at 04:09:15PM +0100, Stijn Hoop wrote:
> > Indeed, the checked out SVN copy appears to be some revision on the
> > branch instead of the latest revision on the 1.1.1 branch (a subtle
> > difference).
> A little hacking later (with my super-rusty Python skills) produced the
> attached patch. It works, but I don't know if it is correct for all
> repositories.
> Now the only difference between the CVS and Subversion checkouts is the fact
> that given identical 1.1 and revisions, CVS checks out revision
> and Subversion checks out revision 1.1. This leads to diffs in $Id$ keyword
> expansion lines in the source files.
> --Stijn
> --
> In the force if Yoda's so strong, construct a sentence with words in
> the proper order then why can't he?

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Feb 19 17:54:20 2004

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.