[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: cvs2svn: another vendor branch problem?

From: Stijn Hoop <stijn_at_win.tue.nl>
Date: 2004-02-18 17:30:10 CET

On Wed, Feb 18, 2004 at 04:09:15PM +0100, Stijn Hoop wrote:
> Indeed, the checked out SVN copy appears to be some revision on the
> branch instead of the latest revision on the 1.1.1 branch (a subtle
> difference).

A little hacking later (with my super-rusty Python skills) produced the
attached patch. It works, but I don't know if it is correct for all

Now the only difference between the CVS and Subversion checkouts is the fact
that given identical 1.1 and revisions, CVS checks out revision
and Subversion checks out revision 1.1. This leads to diffs in $Id$ keyword
expansion lines in the source files.


In the force if Yoda's so strong, construct a sentence with words in
the proper order then why can't he?

  • application/pgp-signature attachment: stored
Received on Wed Feb 18 17:54:38 2004

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.