Re: svn commit: r8621 - in branches/1.0.x: . tools/hook-scripts

On Fri, Feb 13, 2004 at 02:13:01PM -0600, kfogel@collab.net wrote:
> A more important question is: how did this change get into trunk, if
> we'd agreed that it wasn't the way to go? (I don't remember the
> discussion, but if you do, maybe it's time to restart it.)

It was committed to trunk on the 29th of Jan. I've been busy and didn't
notice it until Feb 6th. I posted some emails explaining why it was
wrong. But like I said, I've been busy, so I didn't follow up on it or
notice that we were voting on this.

> As for how the change got into 1.0.x: any trunk change that affects
> only tools/ can go into a release line with just one +1 and a +1 or
> "concept +1" from another committer, which these changes had. See
> HACKING for more details.
>
> So, the gateway to scrutinize in this case is the trunk...

Agreed, but I did respond on the trunk commit although late, why nobody
responded, and nobody said anything about my comments when voting is
unclear to me.

I would have made some noise had I not been busy. I don't think I have
the authority to veto this so I probably wouldn't have. But if it was
clear to me that I had that authority I would have vetoed it.

-- 
Ben Reser <ben@reser.org>
http://ben.reser.org
"Conscience is the inner voice which warns us somebody may be looking."
- H.L. Mencken
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org