Re: svn commit: r8621 - in branches/1.0.x: . tools/hook-scripts

Branko ?ibej wrote:
>
> dlr@tigris.org wrote:
>
> >Author: dlr
> >Date: Thu Feb 12 04:07:35 2004
> >New Revision: 8621
> >
> >Modified:
> > branches/1.0.x/STATUS
> > branches/1.0.x/tools/hook-scripts/commit-access-control.pl.in
> > branches/1.0.x/tools/hook-scripts/commit-email.pl.in
> > branches/1.0.x/tools/hook-scripts/propchange-email.pl.in
> >Log:
> >Backport Blair's r8539 and r8540 commits to fix the shebang lines
> >which were preventing some scripts from running:
> >
> >
> I thought we'd agreed that setting the value of ^W not the right
> solution, and "use warnings" was the right one. How come this change got
> onto the 1.0.x branch?

I didn't recall any agreement when I wrote those changes. And in
fact, I still don't :) How long ago was that said. Any why was
use warnings decided as the right solution?

I'm not in the habit of using "use warnings" since I started with
Perl before that module was written. And I support older versions
of Perl on my own projects.

And probably because nobody noticed and the original commits were a
while ago now.

Best,
Blair

-- 
Blair Zajac <blair@orcaware.com>
Plots of your system's performance - http://www.orcaware.com/orca/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org