Re: svn commit: r8530 - branches/1.0.x

Hi John,

On Tuesday 03 February 2004 10.52, John Szakmeister wrote:
> On Tuesday 03 February 2004 02:27, Jostein Chr. Andersen wrote:
...
> > For me, this sounds like the installer are next to shit but it's
> > tolerable because it's better than nothing (or do I misunderstand
> > here?).
>
> I don't think that's what Branko is saying here. I think he's
> stressing the importance of having an installer script that we're
> happy with, and that he's behind whatever changes you need to make in
> order to make it happen. FWIW, on the Windows platform, it's all that

You are right (of course). I have been very foolish here. Thanks for
stepping in and saying it. :-)

> I use. I have 8 people using SVN on Windows at work, and every single
> one of them use the installer to update their version of Subversion.
> I've been very happy with it, and have had no problems in getting
> Subversion up and running it.

Thanks, nice to know. :-)

Jostein

-- 
http://www.josander.net/kontakt/ ||
http://www.josander.net/en/contact/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org